Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30956 (HP)

Mamta Thapa v. Anuj Katoch

CRMPM/2373/2025 · 2025-10-13

Virender Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Mamta Thapa  Vs  Anuj Katoch Cr. MP(M) No. 2373 of 2025 13.10.2025 Present: Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Panku Chaudhary, Advocate, for the respondent. In view of the no objection, made by learned counsel,   appearing   for   the   non­applicant/respondent, the application, under consideration, is allowed and the delay   in   filing   the   accompanying   Criminal   Revision Petition is ordered to be condoned. 2. Application is, thus, disposed of. Cr. Revision No._______ of 2025 3. Vide order of the even date, passed in CrMP(M) No.   2373   of   2025,   the   delay   in   filing   the   Criminal Revision   has   been   ordered   to   be   condoned. Be registered. 4. Call for the records. CrMPST No. 9021 of 2025 5. By   way   of   the   present   application,   the petitioner/applicant has sought the suspension of order of sentence dated 22.07.2024,  passed by the Court of learned   Chief   Judicial   Magistrate,   Kangra   at Dharamshala, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as the ‘trial Court’), in Criminal Complaint No. 48­III/2022, titled as, ‘Anuj Katoch  Vs  Mamta Thapa’. 6. Vide judgment of conviction dated 20.07.2024 and order  of sentence dated 22.07.2024, the learned trial Court has convicted the petitioner  for the offence punishable   under   Section  138   of   the   Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NI Act’)   and   sentenced   him   to   undergo   simple imprisonment for a period of three months and to pay a compensation of Rs. 2,60,000/­. In default of payment of fine, he has further been sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months. 7. Aggrieved  from   the  said  judgment,  petitioner has preferred Criminal Appeal No. 15­D/X/2024, titled as ‘Mamta Thapa  Vs  Anuj Katoch’, before the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Kangra at Dharamshala, H.P., (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Appellate Court’), which has been dismissed, vide judgment dated 03.05.2025. 8. Now, the petitioner is before this Court by way of the present Criminal Revision Petition, which is likely to take sufficient long time, for its disposal, as such, during the pendency of the present revision petition, the order   of   sentence   dated   22.07.2024,   passed   by   the learned trial Court, is ordered to be suspended, subject to the following conditions: (i) That the applicant shall furnish personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/­, along with one   surety   of   the   like   amount,   to   the satisfaction of the learned trial Court, within a period   of   four   weeks   from   today,   with   an undertaking that he will surrender before the learned   trial   Court   to   serve   the   remainder substantive   sentence,   in   case   of   ultimate dismissal of the present revision petition, by this Court; (ii) That the applicant shall deposit 30% of the total amount of compensation, which has been referred to by the learned trial Court as fine, with the learned trial Court, within a period of six   weeks   from   today,   which   shall   be   in addition   to   the   amount,   if   not,   already deposited by the applicant. (iii) The applicant shall not leave the territory of India without the prior permission of the Court. 9. Application is, thus, disposed of. 10. A copy of this order be sent to the learned trial Court, with a direction that the report of compliance of this order be submitted to this Court. Cr.MPST No.9023 of 2025 11. Application, for the reasons, stated therein, is allowed and disposed of. However,  applicant/petitioner will do the needful, as and when, Court directs to do so. ( Virender Singh ) Judge 13h October, 2025 (Pramod)