1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6507 of 2025 1 - Badh Kunwar W/o Angad Singh Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Kudri, Post Office Kudri Tahsil And District - Korba (C.G.) 2 - Radhe Shyam Gond S/o Dashrath Aged About 49 Years R/o Near Sp Bungalow Ward No. 24, Korba District- Korba (C.G.) 3 - Rekha Soufi W/o Santosh Soufi Aged About 41 Years R/o Pwd Colony, Katghora District- Korba (C.G.) 4 - Ganga Bai Dewangan W/o Malik Ram Dewangan Aged About 57 Years R/o Ward No. 14, Chhurikala District- Korba (C.G.) 5 - Chhat Kunwar W/o Dhansai Aged About 57 Years R/o Village And Post Chaitma, District- Korba (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Public Works Department Bhawan Atal Nagar, New Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Executive Engineer (Public Works Department Korba Division Korba Chhatisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate. For State : Shri Akhilesh Kumar, Govt. Advocate. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 27.06 .202 5 1. Learned counsel for petitioner(s) submits that the petitioner(s) stood retired as Work Charged/Contingency Paid Employee. The petitioner (s) were entitled for leave encashment but till date the respondents have not extended the benefit of leave encashment. He stated that an identical issue has already been decided by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No.3870 of 2021 (Faguvaram Patel & Ors. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) on 30.09.2022. In the light of Faguvaram (supra) the petitioner(s) have raised identical issue which may be 2 allowed. He submits that at this stage the petitioner(s) may be permitted to submit detailed representation before the respondents/competent authority, who, in turn, be directed to consider and decide the same expeditiously within specific period as fixed by this Court. 2. Learned State counsel submits that as the petitioner(s) is/are not pressing this petition on merits and is only seeking a direction to decide the representation to be submitted by petitioner(s) at this stage the State is having no objection. 3. I have heard learned counsel for parties and perused the documents available on record. 4. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner(s), without commenting anything on the merits this petition is disposed of in the light of judgment passed in Faguvaram Patel (Supra) reserving liberty to the petitioner(s) to make detailed representation before the concerned respondent/competent authority. In the event, the petitioner(s) submits representation, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with the relevant rules and law and after verification of the service records of the petitioner(s) expeditiously preferably within the period of 'three months' from the date of receipt of the such representation keeping in mind the decision passed in Faguvaram Patel (Supra). 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge inder