1 2025:CGHC:16029 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP(227) No. 630 of 2019 1. Rupdas S/o Late Ganesh Ram Banjare Aged About 47 Years R/o Village Budgahan, Post Bhatbhera Tahsil Simga, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 2. Pardeshi S/o Late Ganesh Ram Banjare Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Budgahan, Post Bhatbhera Tahsil Simga, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 3. Parasram S/o Late Ganesh Ram Banjare Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Budgahan, Post Bhatbhera Tahsil Simga, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 4. Sukhbai D/o Late Ganesh Ram Banjare Aged About 49 Years W/o Sewakram Satnami, R/o Village Khamhariya, Tahsil Simga, District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 5. Sukhmatiya S/o Late Ganesh Ram Banjare Aged About 40 Years W/o Dashrath Satnami R/o Village Salauni, Tahsil Palari, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners Versus 1. Savitri Bai W/o Late Shri Sukhdev Satnami Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Budgahan, Post Bhatbhera Tahsil Simga, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 2. Shupabai D/o Sukhdev Satnami Aged About 31 Years W/o Jagbandhu Khunte, R/o Village Kotmi, Tahsil Dabhara, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh 3. Rajanikant Pyarelal S/o Rupdas Banjare Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Budgahan, Post Bhatbhera Tahsil Simga, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 4. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Baloda Bazar, District Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioners : None For Respondents No.5/ State : Mr. Dashrath Prajapati, Panel Lawyer Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 04/04/2025 1. The petitioners have filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.(i) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the record pertaining to petitioner’s case. 10.(ii) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to set- aside the order dated 02.07.2019 (Annexure P-1), in the interest of justice. 10.(iii) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to restore the order dated 01.07.2017 passed by the learned trial Court (Annexure P-4), in the interest of justice. 10.(iv) Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted.” 2. As per office report, Civil Appeal No. 10-A/2016 has already been disposed of, and thus, the instant petition has become infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti