GHULAM FATIMA v. MOHD.S.RATHER,SECY.SOCIAL WELFRE AND ANR
CPSW/582/2014 · 2025-07-09
Ma Chowdhary
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3095 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3095 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 582/2014 in SWP No. 2644/2013
Ghulam Fatima
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
vs
Mohd. S. Rather & Anr. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Pallavi Sharma, assisting counsel to Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
ORDER (09.07.2025)
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, despite indicating the name of the learned counsel for the petitioner in the cause list. It appears that either the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed by the implementation of the judgement/order passed by this Court in SWP No. 2644/2013 or the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the instant writ petition, otherwise, he would not have been unrepresented. Be that as it may, the instant contempt petition is disposed of and the proceedings are dropped, however, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek revival/restoration of the petition, in case, cause survives.
(M A CHOWDHARY)
JUDGE
Jammu 09.07.2025 Diksha
Serial No. 24