Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3095 (CHH)

SANDEEP TIWARI RAJ v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/206/2025 · 2025-01-15

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:2566 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 206 of 2025 1 Sandeep Tiwari Raj S/o G. P. Tiwari Aged About 48 Years National President Of Bhartiya Sarvjan Hitaay Party, Office At- H.No.- 00, Anant Vihar Colony, Daldal- Seoni Marg, Mowa, Shankar Nagar, Bindrawangarh, Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Of Ministry Of Urban And Home Administration, Mahanadi Bahvan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Dist.- Raipur (C.G.) 2 Secretary State Election Commission, Election Building, Sector- 19, North Block, New Raipur, Atal Nagar, Dist.- Raipur (C.G.) 3 Commissioner State Election Commission, Election Building, Sector-19, North Block, New Raipur, Atal Nagar, Dist.- Raipur (C.G.) 4 Collector Of Mungeli Cum District Electoral Officer District- Mungeli (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Pallav Mishra, Advocate For Respondent(s) No. 1/ State : Shri Praveen Das, Dy. A.G. For Respondent No. 2 & 3 : Shri R.S. Marhas, Advocate 2 Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 15/01/2025 Heard. 1. By the present writ petition the petitioner is seeking quashment of Annexure P-1 A & B issued by the respondent authority dated 19.12.2024 & 27.12.2024 by which the notification regarding the reservation in ward of Municipal Corporation Mugali has been notified by the prescribed authority. 2. Learned State counsel referring to pg No. 52 Annexure P-5, of the writ petition submits that the petitioner has already submitted an appeal under Rule 6 (5) of the C.G. Nagar Palika Nirvachan Niyam, 1994 which is pending consideration before the District Collector/ District Election Officer, Mungeli. He would further submit that the appeal which is pending before the Collector will be considered and decided in accordance with law by tomorrow itself. 3. On the basis of the submission made by the State counsel, Collector is directed to decide the pending appeal of the petitioner by tomorrow. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE Jyoti