1 2025:CGHC:48042 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P(S) No.5041 of 2020 1 - Smt. Mantori Banjare D/o Dev Ram Banjare Aged About 28 Years Resident Of Gram Panchayat Sendresh, Post Amandulla, Police Station Malkharouda, Tahsil Jaijaipur District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 2 - Smt. Gaytri Lohar W/o Late Shri Narayan Prasad Aged About 44 Years Resident Of Gram Panchayat Raipura, Tahsil Jaijaipur District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 3 - Shashikala Bardwaj W/o Shri Dayaram Bhardwaj Aged About 37 Years Resident Of Gram Panchayat Boerdih (Pisaud) Tahsil Jaijaipur District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh 4 - Pancho Bai W/o Lakhan Lal Aged About 26 Years Resident Of Gram Guchkulia, Post Tushur, Tahsil Jaijaipur District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners versus SISTLA NEELIMA VISHNU PRIYA Digitally signed by SISTLA NEELIMA VISHNU PRIYA Date: 2025.09.18 16:22:27 +0530 2 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Women And Child Development , Administration And Development, Mantralaya , Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar , Naya Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director Women And Child Development Department Directorate Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Collector Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 4 - The District Program Officer Women And Child Development, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 5 - The Project Officer Integrated Child Development Jaijaipur District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 6 - The Chief Exeuctive Officer Zila Panchayat District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 7 - The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Jaijaipur District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 8 - The Program Officer Department Of Women And Child Development District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh...Respondents For Petitioners :None. For Respondents/State :Shri Amandeep Singh, PL. Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order on Board 3 18.09.2025 1. None appeared for the Petitioners even when the case is called in the second round of hearing. On 04.09.2025 also, none appeared. 2. In view of above, since none appeared for the Petitioners and no representation is made, therefore, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this Petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) JUDGE Priya