2025:CGHC:28527 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6546 of 2025 Khemraj Jangde S/o Kanhaiya Lal Jangde Aged About 48 Years Teacher (L.B.) Tribal Girls Hostel Diyabar, Block Bodla, District Kabirdham (C.G.) --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur C.G. 2 - Director, Public Instructions, Directorate, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur C.G. 3 - Collector Kabirdham, District Kabirdham C.G. 4 - District Education Officer Kabirdham, District Kabirdham C.G. ...Respondents (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri Kaushal Yadav, Advocate For Respondents/State : Shri Ajit Singh, GA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 27.06.2025 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the impugned transfer order and action of the respondents whereby the petitioner has been declared surplus Teacher, and consequently transferred under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that list of surplus Teachers published by the respondents is against the rationalization instructions and the same is arbitrary as no proper opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner, and if the Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.06.28 10:27:18 +0530 Wps 6546 of 2025 2 petitioner is not granted interim relief, he/she will suffer with irreparable loss. Therefore, the impugned order is liable to be set aside. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that after due verification of records, the petitioner has been transferred under the rationalization instructions issued by the State Government. It is further submitted that if the petitioner is having any grievance, he/she may move fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee, and the Committee will take a decision on his/her representation in accordance with law within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents. 5. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner is directed to make fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee within a period of five days from today, and thereafter, the Committee shall decide the same within a further period of five days from the date of receipt of representations in accordance with law in objective manner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma