Sl.No. 106 Court No. 35 G.S.Das 25.07.2025 WPA 14896 of 2025 Raju Biswas -Vs- The State of WB & Ors. Mr. Nirmalendu Bera Mr. Gora Chand Samanta Ms. Gopa Das … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Ansar Mandal, ld. AGP Mr. Tanweer J. Mandal … for the State-respondent(s) Mr. Chandra Nath Sarkar … for the respondent no. 4&5 The petitioner submits that he happens to be the recorded owner of a property. Learned advocate for the private respondents, on the other hand, disputes and denies the same and submits that the property was obtained by way of a Will. Learned advocate also submits that the Probate proceedings have been stayed by the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. The petitioner, again, submits that proceedings have been initiated under Section 163 of the BNSS. State has submitted a report which reflects that the police authorities are well aware regarding the disputes and differences between the parties, as such, have drawn up a proceeding under Section 126 of the BNSS. Having considered that the police authorities are well aware regarding the dispute, they would continue their surveillance as also ensure that no untoward incident results because of the strained relationship existing between the parties. With the aforesaid observations, WPA 14896 of 2025 is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Report so submitted be kept with the record. Copy of the report be handed over to both the parties. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)