Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30928 (JHR)

DHARMENDRA SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./3864/2023 · 2025-08-20

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:24492] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.3864 of 2023 ------ Dharmendra Singh aged about 46 years, son of Late Krishna Mohan Singh, resident of Bank Colony Kali Bhasan, Pakur Town, P.O. and P.S.- Pakur, District- Pakur … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sub-Divisional Officer, Pakur, P.O. and P.S.- Pakur, District- Pakur 3. Circle Officer, Pakur, P.O. and P.S.- Pakur, District- Pakur … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ram Prakash Singh, Advocate Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Spl.P.P. ------ Order No:-06 Dated:-20-08-2025 Heard parties. 2. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with a prayer to quash the order passed in a proceeding under Section 144 of Cr.P.C. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order has outlived its life as more than two months have already been elapsed from the date of making of the order by the S.D.M. 4. Considering the aforesaid submissions, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of being infructuous. 5. In view of disposal of the instant Cr.M.P., I.A. No.3488 of 2024, stands disposed of being infructuous. 5. It is made clear that the observations made in the impugned order by the S.D.M., cannot be used adversely against the petitioner in any proceeding in future. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/