Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:61359 Court No. - 86 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8775 of 2024 Applicant :- Vimlesh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Kuldeep Singh Yadav,Piyush Sinha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material brought on record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the F.I.R. was lodged by the police personnel against the applicant and seven other persons showing recovery of 80 Kilogram of contraband-Ganja from their possession. Learned counsel further submits that two accused namely, Sandeep Kumar and Bheemsen have already been enlarged on bail. Since the case of applicant is not on the worse footing than that of the co-accused who have already been enlarged on bail, therefore applicant may also be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been mentioned. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. He next submits that the applicant is in jail since 14.01.2024, with no criminal history. 3. Learned A.GA. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 4. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence and without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed. 5. Let the applicant-Vimlesh, be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 29 of 2024, under Section 8/20 of N.D.P.S. Act and Section 467, 468, 465, 419, 420 of I.P.C., Police Station- Naini, District- Prayagraj, on executing a personal bond and furnishing two local sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence. ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses. iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court. iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission. v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 6. In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, the informant would be free to move an application for cancellation of bail before this Court. Order Date :- 22.4.2025 Mustaqeem. Digitally signed by :- MOHD MUSTAQEEM KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad