Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30922 (PNJ)

RAVINDER SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/12196/2025 · 2025-08-21

Jasjit Singh Bedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-12196-2025 #1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM-M-12196-2025 Date of Decision:-21.08.2025 Ravinder Singh. ......Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana. ......Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present:- Mr. R.S. Rai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Viren Sibal, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Viney Phogat, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana assisted by Inspector Raj Karan. *** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (ORAL) The prayer in the petition under Section 482 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.15 dated 06.04.2023 registered under Sections 120-B, 409, 418, 420, 466, 467, 468, 471, 477-A IPC and Sections 13(2), 13(1)(b), 7, 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 registered at P.S. ACB, Gurugram. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the interim order dated 04.03.2025 passed by this Court, petitioner has joined the investigation. The learned State Counsel on instructions submits that the petitioner has joined investigation in terms of orders dated 04.03.2025 and is not required for custodial interrogation. VINAY MAHAJAN 2025.08.21 16:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-12196-2025 #2 In this view of the matter, interim order dated 04.03.2025 is made absolute. However, the petitioner shall keep on joining the investigation as and when required to do so and he shall abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( JASJIT SINGH BEDI ) JUDGE August 21, 2025 Vinay Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No VINAY MAHAJAN 2025.08.21 16:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document