Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30919 (RAJ)

JALE SINGH YADAV v. STATE OF RAJ AND ORS

CW/9582/2017 · 2025-07-17

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:26838] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9582/2017 Jale Singh Yadav S/o Bhoop Singh Yadav, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Gugria, Post Basai, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Education Secretary, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner. 3. The Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission Through Its Secretary, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Parihar For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.F. Baig Ms. Namita Parihar, Dy.GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 17/07/2025 1. Fundamental prayer of petitioner, in the instant writ petition is that his candidature for the post of School Lecturer (Geography), pursuant to the advertisement dated 16.10.2015, be considered in OBC category and if he is found in merit and eligible, be accorded appointment. 2. This writ petition was filed way back on 15.06.2017 and in the writ petition, it was contended that petitioner has applied under SBC category, and he may be permitted to change his category to OBC and his candidature be considered under the OBC category. 3. It has transpired that during the course of writ petition, the category of SBC was cancelled and the result was revised by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission (RPSC). In the revised result dated 12.06.2017 (Annexure-6), the candidature of petitioner was [2025:RJ-JP:26838] (2 of 2) [CW-9582/2017] considered under OBC category and his roll number finds place in merit. 4. It has further been transpired that document verification of petitioner has also been conducted by the R.P.S.C. and further his name has already been recommended for appointment. However, on account of pendency of this writ petition, the appointment order has not been issued. 5. In view of above facts of the case in hand, once the candidature of petitioner under OBC category has already been considered, moreover he has been selected on merits by the RPSC in the list dated 12.06.2017 and after document verification, name of petitioner has also been recommended for appointment, it is hereby directed to the respondents that now appointment order be issued in favour of petitioner and be allowed to join on the post of School Lecturer (Geography) under the OBC category forthwith, preferably within a period of four weeks. 6. It is made clear that the actual and monetary benefits to the petitioner shall be granted from the date of joining, however, as far as notional benefits are concerned, same may be granted to petitioner, at par with the other candidates similarly situated and selected in the list dated 12.06.2017. 7. With the aforesaid directions, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. The interim stay order dated 20.06.2017 stands merged in the final order. 8. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J GAURAV/RONAK/63