Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010142592025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/355/2025 DR BHASKAR JYOTI SARMAH AND 5 ORS. SON OF JITENDRA NATH SARMAH, BHAGAWATIPARA, TITABAR, JORHAT- 785630 2: BARNALI DAS DAUGHTER OF LATE BIMAL KANTI DAS SOUTH HAIBAR GAON LMD ROAD P.O.- HAIBARGAON NAGAON- 782002 3: DR. PARASA HAZARIKA DAUGHTER OF ARUN CH. HAZARIKA E-7 CSIR NEIST COLONY PULIBOR JORHAT- 785001 4: MD. IMTIAZ ALAM SON OF MAHAMMAD ALI SUNDARBARI NEAR MASJID HOUSE NO. 22 WARD NO. 2 ASSAM SISHU KALYAN ROAS JALUKBARI GUWAHATI- 781014 5: ANGSHUMAN GOSWAMI SON OF MANOJ KUMAR GOSWAMI TULSI SHARMA PATH NEAR JONAKI SANGHA SCHOOL DHALAR SATRA JAIL ROAD JORHAT- 785001 6: DR. PRATIBHA BORAH Page No.# 2/3 DAUGHTER OF LATE TULARAM BORAH FLAT NO. 4A DIAMOND PLAZA MALOCUALI TINIALI JORHAT- 78500 VERSUS NARAYAN KONWAR, IAS AND ANR THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, JANATA BHAWAN, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN-781006 2:DHRUBAJYOTI BORAH THE DIRECTOR THE DIRECTORATE OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN-78101 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S S GOSWAMI, MS. R DEKA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D UPAMANYA (R-2), MR. A R TAHBILDAR (R-1) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 27-04-2026 Heard Mr. S.S. Goswami, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Mr. A.R. Tahbildar, learned counsel for the respondent by placing on record instruction received by him has submitted that the direction passed by this Court vide judgment and order dated 16-05-2024 in W.P.(C) No. 1162/2023 has since been complied with. He submits that the pay protection, as directed by this Court, has been granted to the petitioner and further the services rendered by the petitioners w.e.f. their date of Page No.# 3/3 initial appointment has now been directed to be reckoned for the purpose of granting to them the benefit under the Career Advancement Scheme. The said position has not been disputed by Mr. Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioners. Since the direction passed by this Court has been complied with, the present writ petition stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant