APHC010447822013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 31304/2013 Between: 1. CH.CHANDRA SEKHAR, S/O.RAMALINGA CHOWDARY, R/O # 1-15, KURMAPURAM, RAYAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE WARE HOUSING CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, NEAR GANDHI BHAVAN, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD. 2. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, STATE WARE HOUSING CORPORATION, NEAR POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE FOR GIRLS, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents in disqualifying the technical bid of the Petitioner in procedings No.SWC/RO- KKD/H&T/Adhoc Tender/2013-14, dated 23.10.2013 in returning the prize bid and disqualifying the tender submitted for appointment of H & T Contractor at Mandapet (IG) on adhoc basis, contrary to the laid down law and proceeding to award to contract to the third party as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, unconstitutional and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 38887 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuant to Proceedings bearing No.SWC/RO- KKD/H&T/Adhoc Tender/2013-14, dated 28.10.2013 including the award of contract to third party, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G RAJA BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K SURESH KALAVA(SC FOR APSWC) 2. K SATYA SRINIVASA RAO(SC FOR APSWC) The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Sri J. Santhi Kiran, learned counsel representing Sri G. Raja Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the same has become infructuous. 2. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 04.07.2025 TVN 54 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.31304 OF 2013 Date : 04.07.2025 TVN