[2025:RJ-JP:399] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11815/2024 Nehru Meena S/o Shri Lohade Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Meena Baroda, Police Station Wazirpur, District Gangapur City (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In District Jail, Gangapur City). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Ritesh Kumawat HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 03/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS., on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.497/2023 registered at Police Station Khonagoriyan, District Jaipur City (East) for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 323, 341, 307 & 427 of IPC. Investigation is being conducted for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 323, 341, 307 & 427 of IPC & Section 3/25(6) of Arms Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that although, there is allegation against the petitioner of causing firearm injury but medical report of the injured shows that he has not sustained any firearm injury. He submits that alleged incident took place at the spur of moment on [2025:RJ-JP:399] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11815/2024] account petty issue. Now dispute has been resolved by the parties amicably. It is submitted that other co-accused persons of this case have already been granted benefit of bail by this court as well as co-ordinate bench of this court. Petitioner is in custody since his date of arrest. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. He submits that petitioner is a habitual as 22 other cases have been registered against him. 4. However, learned counsel appearing for injured/complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise & he has no objection if this bail application is allowed. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and as per medical report of injured, he has not sustained any firearm injury; charge-sheet has been filed as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. The observations made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 7. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Nehru Meena S/o Shri Lohade Ram, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together [2025:RJ-JP:399] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11815/2024] with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence on once in three months in the concerned police station. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /54