HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CPSW No. 604/2014 In SWP No. 3210/2014 Vinod Kumar Bhat …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None. vs Vipul Pathak, Secy. Transport & Anr. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, assisting counsel to Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE ORDER (11.07.2025) There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, despite indicating the name of the learned counsel for the petitioner in the cause list. It appears that either the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed by the implementation of the order passed by this Court in SWP No. 3210/2014 or the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the instant contempt petition, otherwise, he would not have been unrepresented. Be that as it may, the instant contempt petition is disposed of and the proceedings are dropped, however, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek revival/restoration of the petition, in case, cause survives. (M A CHOWDHARY) JUDGE Jammu 11.07.2025 Renu Serial No. 32 Renu Bala I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Jammu 14.07.2025 10:13