IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 180 of 2025 Ashok Ram, aged about 45 years, S/o Atish Ram @ Ashish Ram, R/o Village Khas Kajora, Colliery, P.O. Kajoragram, P.S. Andal, District Paschim Burdwan (W.B.) --- --- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand --- --- Opp. Party --- CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath --- For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashutosh Pd. Joshi, Advocate For the O.P-State: Mr. Jitendra Pandey, A.P.P. For the Informant: Mr. Rahul Pandey, Advocate --- 06 / 21.03.2025 Heard the parties. 2. Petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jamtara P.S. Case No. 145 of 2021 for the offences registered under sections 406/420/504/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Miss S.A. Herenz, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamtara. 3. Petitioner appears to be the office bearer of a Company SRMD Pvt. Ltd which deals in selling of land. An agreement was entered into between the petitioner and the Informant for purchase of a particular land for a consideration amount of Rs. 17,20,000/- for which, advance of Rs. 4,50,000/- was also given to the Company of the petitioner. 4. Vide B.A. No. 8143 of 2022, petitioner was granted bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court on the basis of his undertaking that he will execute sale deed in respect of another land in favour of the Informant. The Coordinate Bench while granting bail to the petitioner, also laid down condition that if the petitioner will not execute the sale deed within three months, learned Trial Court shall cancel his bail. However, the petitioner did not fulfil the undertaking given by him. As such, his bail was cancelled. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will execute the sale deed in respect of the land mentioned in para-19 of this bail application in favour of the of the Informant 6. Considering the fact that the bail application of the petitioner was allowed conditionally by the coordinate Bench of this Court on the basis of an undertaking given by the petitioner that he will execute the sale deed in favour of the Informant, but he has not fulfilled his undertaking, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail stands rejected. (Ambuj Nath, J) Ranjeet/