- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25194 WP No. 20249 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 20249 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI MAHALAKSHMI (SAMSKRUTHIKA KALA) HALLI SAMBRAMA) DEVASTHANADA SEVA SAMITHI TRUST (R), SATHANURU VILLAGE AND POST, SEVA SAMITHI TRUST (R), KASABA HOBLI, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT571401. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY SRI. CHENNAKESHAVA, ENNA S/O LATE JAVARAYI HEGGADE, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/AT NO.145, 1 MAIN ROAD, 3RD CROSS, MUTHURAYINAGARA, R.V. COLLEGE POST, MYSURU ROAD, BENGALURU.-560059. (SENIOR CITIZENSHIP BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED) …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BHUVAN K.P.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING BENGALURU 560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25194 WP No. 20249 of 2025 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA-571401 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MANDYA SUB-DIVISION, MANDYA-571401 4. THE TAHSILDAR, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA-571401 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SIDDHARTH BABU RAO, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227B OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 15.11.2024 IN CASE NO. RP NO.382/2024 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AND THE ORDER DATED 23.08.2024 IN CASE R.MISC.NO. 180/2023 PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT PRODUCED AS ANNEXURES - A AND B RESPECTIVELY.II) ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO ENTER THE NAME OF THE TEMPLE IN COLUMN NOS.9 AND 12 OF THE R.T.C. IN RESPECT OF LAND BEARING SY.NO.46 MEASURING 6 ACRES 19 GUNTAS SITUATE AT SATHNUR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT AND DELETE THE WORD GUNDU THOPU FROM THE R.T.C. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER The learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25194 WP No. 20249 of 2025 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. The petitioner herein is assailing the order dated 15.11.2024 in RP No.382/2024 passed by the respondent No.2, and the order dated 23.08.2024 in R.Misc.No.180/2023 passed by the respondent No.3 Annexures-A and B respectively, interalia sought for a direction to enter the name of the temple in the Revenue Records. 4. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the land in question has been declared under Mysore (Religious And Charitable) Inams Abolition Act, 1955. 5. The petitioner herein has not produced the order of re-grant made by the competent Authority to claim rights in respect of the subject land. 6. In that view of the matter, considering the findings recorded by the competent Authority, I am of the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25194 WP No. 20249 of 2025 view that, the land in question has not been re-granted in favour of the petitioner herein. Hence, there is no perversity in the impugned order passed by the respondents - Authorities. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE BKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43