Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30893 (KAR)

SUPER BRAIN PRE SCHOOL v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/20317/2025 · 2025-07-09

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25112 WP No. 20317 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.20317 OF 2025 (EDN-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SUPER BRAIN PRE. SCHOOL REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE/SECRETARY, #004 BLOCK, J5, PWC, MARASANDRA, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI, YELAHANKA, DODDABALLAPUR ROAD, BENGALURU NORTH - 562163. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NITIN A M.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC EDUCATION, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU- 560001. 2. BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER, BENGALURU NORTH DIVISION (04) YELAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560064. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SUKANYA BALIGA, AGA) Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25112 WP No. 20317 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2, VIDE/C4/PA. PRAA. SHAALE/DOORU-669/131/2024- 25/414, DATED 16.06.2025 I.E. ANNX-F. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. In this writ petition, petitioner is assailing the order dated 16.06.2025 (Annexure-F) passed by respondent No.2. 2. It is submitted by learned Additional Government Advocate that the impugned order is appealable under Section 130 of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983. 3. In that view of the matter, reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority, the writ petition is disposed of. 4. Consequently, pending I.A.1/2025 does not survive for consideration. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25112 WP No. 20317 of 2025 5. In view of the above, considering the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, that the appeal would be preferred before the competent authority at the earliest, the order dated 16.06.2025 (Annexure-F) passed by respondent No.2 is hereby stayed for a period of three weeks from today. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 4 Sl No.: 1