- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18631 WP No. 51296 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 51296 OF 2019 (GM-KEB) BETWEEN: M/S. CLEAN SOLAR POWER (GULBARGA) PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 201, THIRD FLOOR, OKHLA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, PHASE-III, NEW DELHI-110 020. (REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR. KUNAL LALIT KAISTHA) AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ARCHISHMAN CHAUDHURY., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD., HAVING ITS OFFICE AT KAVERI BHAVAN, KEMPEGOWDA ROAD, BENGALURU (REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR). 2. KARNATAKA STATE LOAD DISPATCH CENTRE KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED HAVING ITS OFFICE AT RACE COURSE CROSS ROAD, A.R.CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560 009. (REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF ENGINEER). Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18631 WP No. 51296 of 2019 3. SOLAR ENERGY CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 1ST FLOOR, D-3, A-WING, PRIUS PLATINUM BUILDING DISTRICT CENTRE, SAKET, NEW DELHI (REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR). 4. M/S SOLITAIRE POWERTECH PVT. LTD., HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 239, OKHLA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE PHASE-III, NEW DELHI-110 020. (REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR). 5. ENERGY DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT VIKASA SOUDHA, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR STREET, BANGALORE-560 001. (REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY). …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SUMANTH., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SHAHBAAZ HUSSAIN., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & 2; SRI. HEMANTH SAHAI., ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI. RAJAKUMAR.M., AGA FOR R5 NOTICE TO R3-HELD SUFFICIENT V/O DATED:21.04.2021) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18631 WP No. 51296 of 2019 Sri.Sumanth., counsel on behalf of Sri.Shahbaaz Hussain., for respondents 1 and 2 and Sri.Rajakumar.M., AGA for respondent No.5 have appeared in person. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 02.06.2025. On that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioner, the petition was ordered to be listed on 03.06.2025. The petition is listed today. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. As could be seen from the writ papers, the petition is filed in the year 2019. Now we are in the month of June 2025. The petition is pending from six years. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43