Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3089 (KAR)

SHRINIDHI S/O VENKATESH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/100317/2025 · 2025-03-12

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4729 CRL.P No. 100317 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.100317 OF 2025 (439(CR.PC)/483(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SHRINIDHI S/O. VENKATESH AGE: 23 YEARS, OCC. LABOURER, R/O. HOLEMUDLAPUR VILLAGE, TQ. AND DIST. KOPPAL-582114. …PETITIONER (BY SRI B.C.JNANAYYA SWAMI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA (THROUGH MUNIRABAD P.S) REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENCH AT DHARWAD. 2. GANGAMMA W/O. PAKKIRAPPA, AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O. HOLEMUDLAPUR VILLAGE, TQ. AND DIST. KOPPAL-582114. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.GIRIJA S. HIREMATH, HCGP FOR R1; R2-NOTICE SERVED) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/SEC. 439 OF CR.P.C. (U/SEC. 483 OF BNSS, 2023) SEEKING TO ALLOW THIS PETITION AND ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL I SPL. S.C. (POCSO) NO. 70/2024 PENDING ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE FTSC-I AT KOPPAL, IN CONNECTION WITH CR.NO. 200/2024, REGISTERED BY MUNIRABAD POLICE STATION, FOR THE OFFENCES 137(2), 64(1), 351(2), 351(3), 352 OF IPC, AND SEC. 4 OF POCSO ACT 2012. THE SCHEDULED CASTES AND THE SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) AMENDMENT BILL, 2015 U/SEC. 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) 3(1)(w), 3(2)(v), PENDING TRIAL OF THE CASE. V N BADIGER Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Date: 2025.03.19 10:34:38 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4729 CRL.P No. 100317 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) After arguing the matter for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo. Memo reads as under: “The petitioner in the above case is going to withdraw the petition with liberty to file petition after completion of victim evidence. Hence, this memo.” Placing the memo on record, revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. SD/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE HMB CT:PA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 11