HEMLATA MANIKCHAND CHUDIWAL v. GTL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED (GIL) AND ANOTHER
CA/10205/2025 · 2026-03-18
Shri Arun R Pedneker
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3089 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3089 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 967 ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 36 OF 2025 Hemlata Manikchand Chudiwal VERSUS Gtl Infrastructure Limited (gil) And Another ... Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Patodi Rajat Vijaykumar Advocate for Respondents No.1 and 2 : Mr. Arun v. Rakh ... WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10205 OF 2025 IN ARBA/36/2025 ...
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. Dated : March 18, 2026 PER COURT :
1. The learned Counsel for the appellant submits that against the impugned order, an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not maintainable. He, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the present Arbitration Appeal with liberty to file appropriate proceedings.
2. In view of the above, the Arbitration Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. The pending Civil Application also stands disposed of.
( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ) vj gawade/-. Page
1 of
1 2026:BHC-AUG:11889