APHC010447792007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 2643/2007 Between: 1. T. CHALAPATHI,, S/O. TJ. SRINIVASULU, UNEMPLOYEE, C/O. TIRUPATHI KORLAGUNTA, H.NO. 20 CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 1. LABOUR EMPLOY AND TRAIN DEPT 2 ORS, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY LABOUR, EMPLOYEMENT AND DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 2. THE CHAIRMANCUMPRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ANANTAPUR. 3. THECOMMISSIONER TIRUPATHI MUNICIPALITY, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. Petition under Article 226 o circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, ordr or direction, more particuarly one in the nature of Writ of Manamus calkling for the records relati No. 57/2003 dt. 15-9-2006 on the file fo the 2nd respondent was published vide G.O.Rt.No. 2371, Labour Employement Training & Factories (Lab.I) Department, Dt. 13 declare the same as illegal, arbitrary and violation of the principles and contrary to the provisions of the I.D. Act and further declare that the petiitoner IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 2643/2007 T. CHALAPATHI,, S/O. TJ. SRINIVASULU, UNEMPLOYEE, C/O. TIRUPATHI KORLAGUNTA, H.NO. 20-2-658/B, R/O. TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND LABOUR EMPLOY AND TRAIN DEPT 2 ORS, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY LABOUR, EMPLOYEMENT AND TRAINING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. THE CHAIRMANCUMPRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL LABOUR COURT, ANANTAPUR. THECOMMISSIONER TIRUPATHI MUNICIPALITY, CHITTOOR ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, ordr or direction, more particuarly one in the nature of Writ of Manamus calkling for the records relating to the orders passed in ID 2006 on the file fo the 2nd respondent-Court and which was published vide G.O.Rt.No. 2371, Labour Employement Training & Factories (Lab.I) Department, Dt. 13-11-2006 by the first respondent and same as illegal, arbitrary and violation of the principles and contrary to the provisions of the I.D. Act and further declare that the petiitoner IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI T. CHALAPATHI,, S/O. TJ. SRINIVASULU, UNEMPLOYEE, C/O. 658/B, R/O. TIRUPATHI, ...PETITIONER LABOUR EMPLOY AND TRAIN DEPT 2 ORS, REP. BY ITS TRAINING THE CHAIRMANCUMPRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL THECOMMISSIONER TIRUPATHI MUNICIPALITY, CHITTOOR ...RESPONDENT(S): f the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, ordr or direction, more particuarly one in the nature ng to the orders passed in ID Court and which was published vide G.O.Rt.No. 2371, Labour Employement Training & 2006 by the first respondent and same as illegal, arbitrary and violation of the principles and contrary to the provisions of the I.D. Act and further declare that the petiitoner is entitled for reinstatement, continuity of service and full back wages fromt he date of termination till the date of reinstatement and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit andproepr in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 3393 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expediate early hearing of the Writ Petition and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P RAGHAVENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LABOUR 2. DAMERLA RAVI KUMAR The Court made the following: ORDER Sri P.Raghavender Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that cause in this writ petition no longer survives and this writ petition became infructuous and hence prayed to dismiss the writ petition. In view of the submission so made this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR