Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30876 (PNJ)

DIPESH ADLAKHA v. PRIYA ADLAKHA AND ANR.

CRR(F)/484/2023 · 2025-04-24

Namit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 242 Dipesh Adlakha Priya Adlakha and another CORAM : HON'BLE MR Present: Mr. for Mr. Mr. Vishal Aggarwal, Advocate for the *** NAMIT KUMAR 1. The instant challenging the impugned order petitioner has been directed to pay interim maintenance @ Rs.50,000/ to the respondents as well as orders dated 23.01.2023 (Annexures P and 04.02.2023 (Annexure P (Family Court), Ambala. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner has been rendered 3. Dismissed as withdrawn. April 24, 2025 Pankaj* IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR(F)- Date of Decision: Dipesh Adlakha Versus Priya Adlakha and another HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Mr. R.K. Gautam, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gurqurban S. Sarao, Advocate Mr. Vishal Aggarwal, Advocate for the respondents. *** NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) The instant criminal revision petition challenging the impugned order dated 08.12.2022 (Annexure P has been directed to pay interim maintenance @ Rs.50,000/ to the respondents as well as orders dated 23.01.2023 (Annexures P and 04.02.2023 (Annexure P-13) passed by the learned A (Family Court), Ambala. Learned counsel for petitioner submits rendered infructuous, he wishes to withdraw the same. Dismissed as withdrawn. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -484-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision:24.04.2025 ... Petitioner ... Respondent NAMIT KUMAR , Advocate for petition has been filed by the petitioner dated 08.12.2022 (Annexure P-5) whereby the has been directed to pay interim maintenance @ Rs.50,000/- per month to the respondents as well as orders dated 23.01.2023 (Annexures P-11 and P passed by the learned Additional Principle Judge submits that since the instant petition infructuous, he wishes to withdraw the same. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Petitioner ... Respondents petitioner 5) whereby the per month 11 and P-12) Principle Judge that since the instant petition PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.04.25 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh