- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:9925 WP No. 21588 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 21588 OF 2024 (KLR-REG) BETWEEN: SMT. RADHA BAI, W/O LATE R ANANTHARAM SINGH, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT BHAVANAHALLI VILLAGE, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT, (SENIOR CITIZENSHIP BENEFITS NOT CLAIMED) …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H.C. SUNDARESH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR - 563 101. 3. THE TAHASILDAR, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 130. 4. THE SECRETARY, COMMITTEE FOR REGULARIZATION OF UN-AUTHORIZED CULTIVATION, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 130. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. MANJUNATH, AGA) Digitally signed by SWAPNA V Location: high court of karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:9925 WP No. 21588 of 2024 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION FILED THE PETITIONER DATED- 24-02-2023 AS PER ANNEXURE-H RESPECTIVELY, FOR CONSIDERING THE FORM NO.53 FILED BY THE PETITIONER FOR REGULARIZATION OF UNAUTHORIZED CULTIVATION OF 2.00 ACRES 0.25 GUNTAS OF LAND EACH IN SY.NO.119, BHAVANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT ISSUED BY THE TAHASILDAR DATED- NILL AS PER ANNEXURE A AND ETC., THIS W.P., COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to issuance of a direction to the respondents to consider the representation dated 24.02.2023, wherein, the petitioner is requesting for his unauthorized occupation to be regularized as per form No.53. 2. Learned AGA, on instructions, submits that the Tahasildar, on enquiry, has come to the conclusion that petitioner would be ineligible for consideration of his - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:9925 WP No. 21588 of 2024 application and therefore, it has been forwarded to the Deputy Commissioner and in all probability, the orders will be passed within a period of 2 to 3 weeks. 3. In the light of the above submissions, it is clear that the case of the petitioner has been considered and the matter is at the stage of passing of the orders on his application. In that view of the matter, the prayer in this writ petition would not survive for consideration. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of. 4. However, it is made clear that in the event the Deputy Commissioner accepts recommendation of the Tahasildar and holds that the petitioner is ineligible, the petitioner would always have the liberty to challenge the said action. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6