Gali Jagannadham Naidu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLP/8923/2025 · 2025-08-29
B S Bhanumathi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30873 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30873 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010446852025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI SATURDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT i HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI CRIMINAL PETITION No.8923 of 2025 Between: Gali Jagannadham Naidu, S/o. G. Pullama Naidu, Age 70 years, Occ: Business, R/o. F.No. 502, Nmr Diya Residency, Vinayak Nagar, New Hafeezpet, Serilingampally, Miyapur, Hyderabad, Telangana-500049 . ...Petitioner/Accused No.1 AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Amaravathi, A.P.
2. Chappidi Maheswar Naidu, S/o. C. Raja Naidu, Aged 48 years, Occ: Business, R/o. Plot No.505, Dream Avenue Apartment, Kenedy Nagar, Tirupati Town, Tirupathi, Andhra Pradesh. ...Respondents/Complainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS (under Section 482 of Cr.P.C) praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the Petitioner/Accused No.1 in Crime No.398 of 2025 on the file of the P.S. Tirupathi East, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh, for an offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 340(2), 351(2) r/w 3(5) BNS.
d lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS (under Section 482 of Cr.P.C) praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all proceedings against the Petitioner/Accused No.1 in Crime No.398 of 2025 on the file of PS. Tirupathi East, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh pending disposal of the main petition. Counsel for the Petitioner ; Sri Challa Ajay Kumar Counsel for Respondent No.1: Public Prosecutor Counsel for Respondent No.2: None Appeared The Court made the following order:
APHC010447052025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3311] Saturday, the thirtieth day of August two thousand and twenty five Present The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Criminal Petition No: 8923 of 2025 Between: ...Petitioner/ A-1 Gali Jagannadham Naidu and The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents/Complainan ts Counsel for the petitioner: I.Chalia Ajay Kumar Counsel for the respondents: Nil The Court made the following:
Crl.P.No.8923of 2025
ORDER: This criminal petition is filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. to quash the proceedings against the petitioner / accused No.1 in Crime No.398 of 2025 of Tirupathi East P.S., Chittoor District, for offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 340(2), 351(2) r/w 3(5) B.N.S. The case of the petitioner / A.1 is briefly as follows;
2. The respondent No.2 lodged a complaint on 20.08.2025 that A-1 and A-2 came to the house of the complainant in the month of October, 2024 and informed that the bio-liquor business had been started in the State of Telangana and the business is running very well; that they had started the same business in Andhra Pradesh and earning huge money and demanded the complainant to give 60% share of his money for business expenditure; that believing the words of A-1 and A-2, the complainant had given an amount of Rs.1,92,00,000/- to A-1 and A-2 through cash and two account holders in various bank accounts, which shown by A-1 and A-2 for business purpose; that A-1 and A-2 had agreement to the complainant as genuine by putting forged were given an signature of B.Srinivasulu, who is the owner of bio-liquor; that after knowing the fraudulent acts of A-1 and A-2, the complainant had requested them to repay the total amount, but, they had not repaid the amount and thereby cheated and threatened the complainant with dire due to financial disputes; and that after informing the consequences same to the elders, on 20.08.2025, the complainant had lodged a report.
3. Ms. K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, representing the respondent No.1, submitted that Section 35(3) of B.N.S.S. would be followed as the offences covered by the F.I.R. are within the scope of it.
-V-. 3 Crl.P.No.8923 of 2025 As such, the learned counsel for the petitioner requested to dispose of the criminal petition recording the same. In the result, the petition is disposed of directing the Station House Officer concerned to follow Section 35(3) of the B.N.S.S.
4.
5. There shall be no
order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/-B PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To Tirupathi East Police Station, Chittoor High Court of Andhra Pradesh,
1. The Station House Officer, District.
2. Two CCS to the Public Prosecutor Amaravathi[OUT]
3. OneCC
4. Two CD Copies to Sri Challa Ajay Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] TK vna
HIGH COURT DATED:30/08/2025
ORDER Of a I t SEP 2025 )S') yco' V^NOifrent Section^'^ CRLP No.8923 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION