Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
TRPC 309/ 2025 p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK
TRP(C) No.309 of 2025
Mitanjali Nayak
....... Petitioner
-Versus- Mukesh Kumar Nayak ....... Opposite Party
For Petitioner : Ms. A. Mohanty, Advocate
For Opposite Party : Mr. P.C. Mishra, Advocate
----------------------------
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date of Hearing & Judgment: 09.01.2026 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
S.K. MISHRA, J.
1. The present transfer petition has been preferred by the Petitioner-Wife for transfer of proceeding in C.P. No.183 of 2025, pending in the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Cuttack, to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court-II, Bhubaneswar on the grounds detailed in the transfer petition. 2. Being noticed, though the Opposite Party-Husband has appeared in the present case, but till date no written objection has been filed opposing to the prayer for transfer. 3. However, on being asked, learned Counsel for the Opposite Party submits, instead of filing written objection to
TRPC 309/ 2025 p. 2 the transfer petition, he would like to have his oral objection to oppose the prayer made in the transfer petition. 4. Hence, on consent of the learned Counsel for the Parties, the transfer petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at the stage of admission. 5. Reiterating the grounds urged in the transfer petition, learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner was subjected to cruelty and was driven out of her matrimonial home in February, 2024. Thereafter she has been residing separately at Ghatikia, Bhubaneswar and at present working as a staff nurse at IGKC Hospital, Bhubaneswar with meager income for her sustenance, which is barely sufficient to maintain herself. The Petitioner has no financial or emotional support from her parents, who are themselves old and infirm. 6. That apart she has also filed D.V. Misc. Case No.521 of 2025, which is now pending before the learned JMFC-V, (Cog) Bhubaneswar. On being noticed, the Opposite Party-Husband has appeared and is contesting the said case at Bhubaneswar. She has also lodged an FIR against the Opposite Party and his family members at Bharatpur Police
TRPC 309/ 2025 p. 3 Station, Bhubaneswar on 15.02.2025, which was registered as Bharatpur P.S. Case No.77 of 2025 for alleged offences under section 126(2), 85, 296, 115(2), 351(2), 324(4), 3(5) of BNS, which is pending before the learned JMFC-V, Bhubaneswar under C.T. Case No.219 of 2025. 7. She further submits, being arrested, the Opposite Party-Husband is on bail and there is a life threat to her, if she attends the day to day proceeding at Cuttack. 8. Ms.
Mohanty, learned Counsel for the Petitioner further submits, though the Petitioner, with much difficulty, is appearing before the Counselor of the learned Judge, Family Court, Cuttack for counseling, she being accompanied by her Associate for her safety point of view, but the Opposite Party Husband is neither appearing nor cooperating with the Counselor and she is being intentionally harassed by the Opposite Party-Husband. 9. Per contra, learned Counsel for the Opposite Party submits, the allegations made in the transfer petition are false and baseless. That apart, the distance from Bhubaneswar to Cuttack would be hardly 25 to 30 K.Ms. and she may not face
TRPC 309/ 2025 p. 4 any difficulty to attend the day to day proceeding before the learned Judge, Family Court, Cuttack. 10. That apart, if she feels unsafe to appear before the learned Judge, Family Court, Cuttack, she may move application before the learned Judge, Family Court, Cuttack to permit her to appear through virtual mode. 11. As per the settled position of law, so far as transfer of matrimonial disputes, the convenience of the wife is the paramount consideration. 12. At this juncture, it would be apt to deal with the
Judgment of the Supreme Court reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 1199 (N.C.V. Aishwarya Vs. A.S. Saravana Karthik Sha), wherein it was held as follows:-
“8. It is not disputed that the appellant is the resident of Chennai and that the appellant’s husband-respondent herein is the resident of Vellore and he is employed. The appellant who is 21 years old does not have any source of income of her own as she is not employed and is totally dependent on her parents for her livelihood. In order to attend the court proceedings of the case filed by her husband at Vellore she has to travel alone all the way from Chennai to Vellore as her parents are not in a position to accompany her on account of their old age. Secondly, the appellant has also filed a petition, H.M.O.P. No.1741 of 2021, for restitution of conjugal rights and another petition, M.C. Sr. No.672 of 2021, for her maintenance before the Family Court at Chennai.
TRPC 309/ 2025 p. 5 9. The cardinal principle for exercise of power under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure is that the ends of justice should demand the transfer of the suit, appeal or other proceeding. In matrimonial matters, wherever Courts are called upon to consider the plea of transfer, the Courts have to take into consideration the economic soundness of both the parties, the social strata of the spouses and their behavioural pattern, their standard of life prior to the marriage and subsequent thereto and the circumstances of both the parties in eking out their livelihood and under whose protective umbrella they are seeking their sustenance to life. Given the prevailing socioeconomic paradigm in the Indian society, generally, it is the wife’s convenience which must be looked at while considering transfer. (Emphasis Supplied)
13. In view of the reasons detailed in the transfer petition so also submissions made by the learned Counsel for the parties and the settled position of law, this Court is inclined to allow the prayer made in the transfer petition.
14. Accordingly, the learned Judge, Family Court, Cuttack is directed to transmit the case record in C.P. No.183 of 2025 to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court-II, Bhubaneswar at the earliest, preferably within a period of one week from the date of production of certified copy of this
judgment.
15. On receiving the case record in C.P. No.183 of 2025 from the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Cuttack, the
TRPC 309/ 2025 p. 6 learned Judge, Family Court-II, Bhubaneswar shall re-register the said case, if so required, and proceed further in accordance with law giving due opportunity to both the parties.
16. The learned Judge, Family Court-II, Bhubaneswar is requested to explore the facilities of Video Conferencing available in the said Court and permit the parties to appear before him through virtual mode following due procedure, as prescribed under the Orissa High Court Video Conferencing for Courts Rules, 2020. However, on the dates of effective hearing i.e. for examination and cross-examination of witnesses and other purposes, for which their presence may be required by the Court and if it is so ordered, the parties shall remain physically present before the learned Judge, Family Court-II, Bhubaneswar.
17. After the case is transferred to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court-II, Bhubaneswar, to avoid delay and notice, both the Parties are directed to make a query before the learned Judge, Family Court-II, Bhubaneswar themselves or through their Counsels to ascertain the date and purpose of
TRPC 309/ 2025 p. 7 posting of C.P. No.183 of 2025, and participate in the said proceeding.
18. Both the Parties are further directed not to seek for unnecessary adjournments and cooperate with the learned Judge, Family Court-II, Bhubaneswar, who shall do well to conclude the said proceedings at the earliest.
19. With the said observation and direction, the transfer petition stands disposed of.
20. Office is directed to communicate a copy of this
order to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Cuttack so also the learned Judge, Family Court-II, Bhubaneswar for compliance.
21. Urgent certified copy be granted on proper application as per rules.
….………..……………
S.K. Mishra, J.
Orissa High Court, Cuttack. Dated, the 9th January, 2026/ Banita Designation: SR. STENOGRAPHER