ABHILASH KUMAR @ SONY (A4) v. THE STATE REPRESENTED BY
CRL OP/6967/2025 · 2025-03-11
Sunder Mohan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30864 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30864 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.OP.No.6967 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 11.03.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Crl.O.P.No.6967 of 2025 1.Abhilash Kumar @ Sony 2.Prathap @ Pradhap .. Petitioners Vs. The State rep by The Inspector of Police, Kurisilapet Police Station, Thirupattur District. (Crime No.373 of 2024) .. Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.373 of 2024 on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : M/s.Magesh Kumar
For Respondent : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate(Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 303(2) of BNS, 2023 in Page No.1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.6967 of 2025 Crime No.373 of 2024, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners had stolen one number of RRU (Radio Remote Unit) worth about Rs.1,00,000/- from Airtel Company.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the allegations are false; and that in any case, custodial interrogation is not required and sought for anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police, while opposing the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners, reiterated the prosecution case and on instructions submitted that property has not been recovered; that the petitioners were involved in two other cases of a similar nature.
5. Considering the nature of allegations, the petitioners were involved in two other cases of a similar nature, the fact that the stolen articles are yet to be recovered, this Court is not inclined to grant Page No.2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.6967 of 2025 anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed. 11.03.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No dpa To 1.The Inspector of Police, Kurisilapet Police Station, Thirupattur District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai. Page No.3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.6967 of 2025 SUNDER MOHAN , J. dpa
Crl.O.P.No.6967 of 2025 11.03.2025 Page No.4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis