Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18890 RPFC No. 193 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 193 OF 2017 BETWEEN:
SMT. D. SHANTHALAKSHMI, W/O R.K.MANJUNATHA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, DOOR NO.56, OBLAPPA STREET, CHIKKAMAVALLI, BENGALURU – 560 004. …PETITIONER (BY SRI H.V.MANJUNATHA, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
SRI R.K.MANJUNATHA, S/O KRISHNAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO.69, OBALAPPA STREET, CHIKKAMAVALLI, BENGALURU – 560 004. …RESPONDENT
THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF FAMILY COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 22.09.2016 IN CRL. MISC. NO.382/2012 ON THE FILE OF IV ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT BENGALURU AND TO ALLOW THE PETITION.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18890 RPFC No. 193 of 2017
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL ORDER This is an RPFC of the year 2017. Once the process fee has been paid and the notice is sent, the said notice returned as 'Door locked.' Thereafter, for issuance of notice for the second time, the petitioner has not taken steps in this matter. When the matter came up before the Court on 02.01.2024 and 23.01.2024, a week's time was granted to do the needful and again on 05.02.2024, a week's time was granted to do the needful. In spite of that, the petitioner has not done the needful.
2. When the matter came up before this Court on 03.06.2025, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'dismissal' for today. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
CPN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5