Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30864 (AP)

SHRI SHYAM DAS JI v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/23017/2024 · 2025-08-20

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010447762024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 23017/2024 Between: SHRI SHYAM DAS JI, VIRAKT DISCIPLE OF (LATE) SHRI DEVENDRA DAS JI, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/O SHRI HAATHIRAM JI MUTT, TIRUMALAI, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, BLDG.NO.4, SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, , O/O. D.G.P. AT POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, AT MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, O/O. S.P. AT TIRUPATI URBAN, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, A.P. 4. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, O/O. SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICE, 2ND FLOOR, EAST POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, A.P. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, EAST POLICE STATION, O/O. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, EAST POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAVI KIRAN KUMAR KOLUSU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring that non- consideration of Petitioner’s complaint dt.29/07/2024 requesting to register a FIR against one Omprkash Mishra as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and unjustifiable and in violation of Principles of Natural Justice.” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that, the matter is civil in nature and the Police cannot interfere in the civil issues unless there is a direction from the Court. 3. Sri Kolusu Ravi Kiran Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of giving liberty to the Petitioner to work out his remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:21.08.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.23017 of 2024 Dt.21.08.2025 Dinesh