Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3086 (PAT)

Prabhash Chandra Thakur v. The State of Bihar through the Collector Purnia

MJC/4195/2025 · 2026-03-18

Rajiv Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4195 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10269 of 2025 ====================================================== Prabhash Chandra Thakur S/o Late Subhash Chandra Thakur, Resident of 417, Village and P.S.- Barhara Kothi, Bishunpur, Bishanpur Deorhi, District Purnia. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Collector Purnia Purnia. 2. The Collector cum District Magistrate, Purnia namely Shri Anshul Kumar s/o not known to the petitioner. 3. The Additional Collector cum District Magistrate, Purnia namely Shri Ravi Prakash s/o not known to the petitioner. 4. The Sub-divisional Officer, Dhamdaha, Purnia namely Shri Anupam Kumar s/o not known to the petitioner. 5. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms Dhamdaha, Purnia namely Shri Mohit Anand s/o not known to the petitioner. 6. The Circle Officer, Dhamdaha, Purnia namely shri Rabindra Nath s/o not known to the petitioner. 7. The Sub Registrar, Registration Office Dhamdaha, Purnia namely shri Suhail Akhtar s/o not known to the petitioner. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanat Kumar Mishra, Advocate : Mr. Anand Tiwari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Standing Counsel 12 : Mr. Kamlesh Kishore, AC to SC-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 18-03-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s): “for initiating the contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for their Patna High Court MJC No.4195 of 2025(2) dt.18-03-2026 2/2 willful and deliberate violation of the order dated 03.07.2025 passed by the Hon’ble Court in CWJC No. 10269 of 2025.” 3. On the instruction of Mr. Sanat Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, it has been informed by Mr. Anand Tiwari that the order stands complied and as such, he may be permitted to withdraw the petition. 4. Having convinced that the order stands complied, the writ petition stands disposed of. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U