KULDEEP SINGH SON OF SHRI KUSHALPAL SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/6789/2024 · 2025-03-03
Ganesh Ram Meena
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30857 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30857 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:9171] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6789/2024 Kuldeep Singh Son Of Shri Kushalpal Singh, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Village Murwara, Police Station Sewar, District Bharatpur (Raj). ----Complainant/Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. Superintendent Of Police, Bharatpur, District Bharatpur (Raj).
4. S.h.o. Police Station Sewar, District Bharatpur ( Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ved Prakash Sogarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP with Mr. Anil Doriya, Dy. S.P., Ucchhain, Bharatpur HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 03/03/2025
1. The present petition under Section 528 B.N.S.S., 2023 has been filed by the complainant-petitioner with a prayer to issue directions to the respondents authorities to make fair and impartial investigation in the criminal case bearing F.I.R. No.269/2023 (dated 15.05.2023), registered with the Police Station Sewar, District Bharatpur for offence punishable under Sections 420, 120-B, 467, 468 & 471 of IPC.
2. Learned Public Prosecutor on instructions from the Investigating Officer, who is also personally present before this
[2025:RJ-JP:9171] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6789/2024] Court, submits that earlier also, after conclusion of the investigation, final negative report was submitted before the concerned Magistrate, however, under the direction of the high authorities of the Department, further investigation was conducted at certain points, as agitated by the complainant-petitioner. Counsel further submits that after having thorough investigation with regard to the issue raised by the complainant-petitioner, now again the investigation agency has proposed the final negative report, which is to be submitted before the concerned Magistrate.
3. In view of the statement made by learned Public Prosecutor on instruction of the Investigating Officer, no further direction, as prayed by the complainant-petitioner in the petition, can be issued at this stage and, therefore, the present criminal misc. petition is disposed of.
4. Accordingly, the present criminal misc. petition stands
disposed of with liberty to the complainant-petitioner to raise his grievance with regard to conclusion of the investigation before the concerned Magistrate by availing an appropriate remedy available to him under the law.
5. The stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /97