Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30856 (ALL)

BIJENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

WRIC/7968/2025 · 2025-03-18

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:39045 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7968 of 2025 Petitioner :- Bijendra Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhilesh Kumar Pandey,Namit Srivastava,Rajesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Singh Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer: "I. A writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondents to take appropriate legal action to restore the road on the land of Khasra No. 2187 Gha. II. A writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondents to take appropriate legal action on the representations moved before them on different dates." 3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy to approach appropriate authority by moving an application under Section 26 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 in view of the judgment passed by this Court in Jahar Singh v. State of U.P. reported in 2017(4) ADJ 619 as well as in Kanhaiya Lal v. State of U.P. and others reported in 2023 (12) ADJ 226. 4. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the instant petition. 5. In case, the petitioner moves an application under Section 26 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, before appropriate authority, the same shall be decided after hearing all the concerned parties in accordance with law. 6. With the aforesaid observation, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 19.3.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad