Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30852 (KAR)

SRI. S A PRASANNA KUMAR v. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER

WP/49993/2019 · 2025-01-17

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1978 WP No. 49993 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 49993 OF 2019 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. S.A.PRASANNA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/O ANKEGOWDA, NO.218, SAMPAHALLI, GOPALAPURA ROAD, MANDYA-571 402. 2. SRI. S.A.RAGHUNANDAN S/O ANKEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, 3. SRI. S.K.ANKEGOWDA S/O KALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.217, KENCHEGOWDA, SHIVANANAVARA ALEMANE STREET, SAMPAHALLI, MANDYA-571 402. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K.N.VISHWACHETHANA., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, HDFC BANK LTD., MYTHRI ARCADE, KANTHARAJE URS ROAD, FIRST MAIN, SARASWATHIPURAM, MYSORE. …RESPONDENT Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1978 WP No. 49993 of 2019 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioners are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the Writ papers, the petition is filed in the year 2019. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The petition is pending from six years. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioners are not represented. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 2