Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30850 (AP)

M/s Aparajita CNC Technologies, v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/21446/2019 · 2025-06-29

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010446062019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 21446/2019 Between: 1. M/S APARAJITA CNC TECHNOLOGIES,, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SRI.BONDALAPATI SURESH BABU S/O BUJJI BABU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RIO PLOT NO.64, SUBASH NAGAR, IDA JEEDIMETLA, QUTHBULLAPUR, MEDCHAL, TELANGANA ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. APIIC, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. APIIC, REP BY ITS ZONAL MANAGER, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, VIJAYAWADA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by directing the proceedings issued by the 2nd respondent in letter No.33535/APIIC/M IP/Mallavalli/VZAJ2018/PNo.11/81/2018, Dated. 13/12/2019 in cancelling the allotment of P.No.11/81/2018 made to the petitioner herein by forfeiting the EMD paid with the application and further directing that the land cost deposited shall be refunded as per allotment regulation as being illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and in gross violation of the Article 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the letter and spirit of the regulations framed by the 1st respondent and further direct the respondents to register the sale agreement in favour of the petitioner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings in letter No. 33535/ANIC/M IP/Mallavalli/VZA/2018/P No.11/81/2018, Dated. 13/12/2019, issued by the 2" respondent herein pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR INDUSTRIES COMMERCE (AP) 2. J UGRANARASIMHA (SC FOR APIIC) The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: In pursuance of the Memo filed vide U.S.R.No.55647 of 2025, dated 17.06.2025, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 30.06.2025 TVN 112 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.21446 OF 2019 Date : 30.06.2025 TVN