VIJAY CHANDRAVANSHI ALIAS VIJAY RAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./959/2025 · 2025-02-13
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30846 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30846 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.959 of 2025
------
1. Vijay Chandravanshi @ Vijay Ram, aged about 46 years, s/o Bharat Ram, r/o village Kharaundhi, PO & PS Kharaundhi dist. Garhwa
2. Rita Devi, aged about 39 years, w/o Vijay Ram, r/o village Kharaundhi, PO & PS Kharaundhi, dist. Garhwa
3. Ranjan Chandravanshi @ Ranjan Kumar Rawani, aged about 27 years, s/o Vijay Ram, r/o village Kharaundhi, PO & PS Kharaundhi, dist. Garhwa
.... .... …. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Subodh Kumar Dubey, Adl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 13-02-2025 Heard the parties.
Apprehending their arrest in connection with Khraundhi P.S. Case No.67 of 2024 instituted under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 3(5) of BNS, 2023, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder the informant and his wife Lila Devi. It has further been submitted that the petitioners and victim are neighbours. It is then submitted that there was quarrel between two families and hence this false case has been lodged. It has further been submitted that the petitioners are no intention to kill anybody and the alleged assault was made by hard and blunt object. It is further submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and that they will not annoy or disturb the informant, or his family members in any manner during the pendency of the
case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.20,000/- each and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Nagar Untari, Garhwa in connection with Khraundhi P.S. Case No.67 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case and further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Anjali/