APHC010446082025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22651/2025 Between: 1. M. BHASKAR REDDY,, S/O. VEERA REDDY, AGED 46 YEARS, OCC - PVT. EMPLOYEE, PERMANENT R/O H.NO. 1-81, ARIVEMULA VILLAGE, C.S. PURAM MANDAL,PRAKASAM DISTRICT, NOW R/O. D.NO.101/1, M.A. MEENAKSHI APT. HALASURU, DODDAKATTA ROAD, BANGLORE, KARNATAKA STATE-560008 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, C.S. PURAM POLICE STATION, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. VARIKUTI NAGARJUNA REDDY, S/O SUBBA REEDY AGED MAJOR, OCC- BUSINESS, JANGAVARIPALLI VILLAGE, C.S. PURAM MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22651 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the 3rd respondent - Sub Inspector of Police, C.S. Puram Police Station, in interfering with civil disputes between the petitioner and the 4th respondent, and in calling the petitioner to the police station on 28.07.2025, 08.08.2025 and 20.08.2025 through mobile No. 8501918166 and insisting upon payment of amounts, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 not to interfere in any manner in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the 4th respondent, except in accordance with law and to pass.…” 2. Heard Sri G.Sekhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the 4th respondent lodged a complaint before the SHO, C.S.Puram Police Station, Prakasam District on 19.08.2025. The respondent-police called the petitioner for preliminary enquiry only. But the petitioner did not turn up for preliminary enquiry and no crime has been registered against the petitioner. He would further submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between petitioner and the unofficial respondent. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4 5. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to call the petitioner to the police station since no crime has been registered against the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 03.09.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.22651 of 2025 Dated.03.09.2025 UPS 89