Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:39783 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3360 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rabita Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nand Kishor Mishra,Sanjay Kumar Asthana Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner seeks a direction to the District Programme Officer, Jalaun for deciding the representation made by her on 22.02.2025. The plea taken in the representation is that Priyanka Devi, who had been selected as Anganbadi Karyakatri is having good financial status and, therefore, she could not have been appointed and accordingly, an investigation should be conducted in the matter. From the perusal of the array of parties it is apparent that petitioner has not impleaded Priyanka Devi as one of the respondents. In the event petitioner is seeking a direction for investigation/ inquiry into the appointment of Priyanka Devi, then Priyanka Devi becomes a necessary party to the petition. Petition therefore, deserves to be dismissed on the ground of non- joinder of necessary parties. Petition is accordingly dismissed with a liberty to file a proper petition. Order Date :- 19.3.2025 IrfanUddin Digitally signed by :- IRFAN UDDIN SIDDIKI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad