Reka v. The State rep by, The Sub Inspector of Police
CRL OP/5707/2025 · 2025-03-06
Sunder Mohan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30837 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30837 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 5707 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-03-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL OP No. 5707 of 2025 1.Reka D/o.Subramaniam, W/o.Sathiskumar, No.46 A, Ranganathapuram 1st Street, Rayapuram, Tiruppur District - 641
604. 2.Krishnakumar Petitioner(s) Vs The State rep by, The Sub Inspector of Police, CCD-II, Tiruppur City Police Station, Tiruppur District. (Crime.No.60/2024). Respondent(s) CRL OP No. 5707 of 2025 PRAYER To enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.60/2024 on the file of the respondent police and thus render justice. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 5707 of 2025 CRL OP No. 5707 of 2025 For Petitioner(s): Mr.Prabhakaran Karuppannan For Respondent(s): Mr. S. Santhosh, Government Advocate ORDER The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 67 of Information Technology Act and Sections 78 and 79 of BNS, 2023 in Crime No.60 of 2024, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that, the defacto complainant and A1's husband had illicit affair; that on account of which, A1 had previous enmity with the defacto complainant and hence the petitioners had posted highly derogatory messages about the defacto complainant and her daughter in the instagram account of the defacto complainant's daughter. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners without prejudice to their defence have filed an affidavit of undertaking stating https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 5707 of 2025 that, they will not send such derogatory messages containing either vulgar or unparliamentary words. 4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police, while opposing for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners, reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the comment made by the petitioners have been removed. 5. Considering the above said facts, the fact that the petitioners have filed an affidavit undertaking that they will not post any such comments in future, the custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not required. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 6.
Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Tiruppur, on condition that each of the petitioners shall execute https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 5707 of 2025 separate bonds for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the said Magistrate, on further condition that: [a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. [c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 5707 of 2025 Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 06-03-2025 AT Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 5707 of 2025 SUNDER MOHAN, J. AT CRL OP No. 5707 of 2025 To 1.The State rep by, The Sub Inspector of Police, CCD-II, Tiruppur City Police Station, Tiruppur District. (Crime.No.60/2024). Crl.O.P.No. 5707 of 2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis