Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30833 (KAR)

MRS. RATHNAMMA V v. MR. Y V NAGARAJ

CRP/543/2023 · 2025-02-14

R Devdas

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6736 CRP No. 543 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 543 OF 2023 BETWEEN: MRS. RATHNAMMA V AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, W/O D.R. VENKATESH R/AT NO. 1085/1, 9TH A MAIN ROAD, 1ST STAGE, HRBR LAYOUT, KALYANA NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560043. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MOHANA CHANDRA P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR. Y V NAGARAJ S/O VENKATARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT MEDI THAMBAHALLI VILLAGE, HUTHURU HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK - 563103. 2. MR. BOSEGOWDA, S/O LATE B. VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 3. MR. BALAJI, S/O BOSEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6736 CRP No. 543 of 2023 4. MR. GANESH, S/O BOSEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, 5. MRS. CHOWDAMMA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, W/O RAJAPPA, D/O VENAKTARAMAPPA, 6. MR. VENKATARAMANAPPA, S/O RAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 7. MR. SRINIVAS, S./O RAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, 8. MR. LAKSHMINARAYANA, S/O RAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 8 ARE R/AT NO. 7/106, LINGAPURA VILLAGE, BAGALURU HOBLI, HOSURU TALUK, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT TAMILNADU - 635103 …RESPONDENTS THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 30.06.2023 PASSED ON IA No. IV IN OS No. 13/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOLAR, DISMISSING THE IA No. IV FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(a) AND (d) OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:6736 CRP No. 543 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 14.02.2025 stating that the plaint in O.S.No.13/2022 was returned by order dated 25.10.2024. Therefore, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer made in the civil revision petition has become infructuous. 2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. 3. Accordingly, the civil revision petition stands disposed of, since the prayer made in the civil revision petition has become infructuous. 4. Pending I.As., if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL CT: JL