M/S SHRI GANPATI TUBEWELL COMPANY v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
SAW/62/2024 · 2025-08-04
Sanjeet Purohit, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Review Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3083 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3083 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:29695-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 62/2024 M/s Shri Ganpati Tubewell Company, Through Proprietor Mahesh Kumar Mittal, Near New Bus Stand, Shahpura, Jaipur - 303103 (Raj.). ----Appellant-Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Public Health Engineering And Ground Water Department, Government of Rajasthan, 5105, Main Building, Government Secretariat, Jaipur-302005.
2. Additional Chief Engineer, PHED, Region-I, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur (Raj). ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Shantnu Sharma for Mr. Sanjay Rahar For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT
Order 04/08/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the appellant fairly states that the issue involved in the present appeal has been adjudicated by this Court in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.68/2024: M/s Shri Ganpati Tubewell Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr., wherein this Court held as under:
"2. Taking into consideration the cause shown in the application as also short period of delay, the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is allowed and delay in filing of the appeal is condoned.
[2025:RJ-JP:29695-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-62/2024]
3. Heard.
4. Though number of grounds have been urged, taking into consideration that the impugned order is outcome of consent between the parties, we are not inclined to entertain this appeal.
5. Appeal is dismissed with liberty to the appellant to file review petition."
2. In view of the above, the present appeal also raising the same issue, is accordingly dismissed mutatis mutandis.
(SANJEET PUROHIT),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J GAURAV/AVINASH/39