[2025:RJ-JP:4329] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16289/2019 1. Smt. Nana W/o Shri Sitaram, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Gram Beejalpura, Tehsil Peeplu, Distt. Tonk (Raj.) 2. Smt. Shravani W/o Ramnarayan, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Gram Beejalpura, Tehsil Peeplu, Distt. Tonk (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. Suresh S/o Rameshwar Lal Jat, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Chandmakala, Tehsil Phagi, Distt. Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Satyanarayan S/o Ramkaran @ Ramcharan, Aged About 68 Years, R/o Gram Ranoli, Tehsil Peeplu, Distt. Tonk (Raj.) Present R/o Mehandi Bagh, Tonk (Raj.) And Stamp Seller Court Premises, Tonk (Raj.). 3. Harinarayan S/o Ramkaran @ Ramcharan, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Gram Ranoli, Tehsil Peeplu, Distt. Tonk (Raj.) Present R/o Mehandi Bagh, Tonk (Raj.). 4. Sitaram S/o Ramkaran @ Ramcharan, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Gram Ranoli, Tehsil Peeplu, Distt. Tonk (Raj.) Present R/o Vikas Vihar Colony, Behind Dipo, Street Near Swaraj Company, Tonk (Raj.) And Advocate Court Premises, Tonk (Raj.) 5. Tehsildar, Peeplu, Distt. Tonk (Raj.) 6. Sub-Registrar, Peeplu, Distt. Tonk (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Sharma for Mr. Sandeep Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxmi Kant Malpura HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 31/01/2025 1. Petitioners-defendants preferred this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, feeling aggrieved by [2025:RJ-JP:4329] (2 of 2) [CW-16289/2019] rejection of his application under Order 7 Rule 11 vide order dated 03.07.2019. 2. Counsel for petitioners states that during pendency of this writ petition, the suit itself has been decided in terms of compromise, therefore, the instant writ petition has become infructuous. 3. In that view, the writ petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous. 4. Stay application and any other pending application, if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /200