Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30829 (JHR)

RAJESH YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY

WPC/975/2025 · 2025-09-02

Rajesh Kumar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:26587 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.975 of 2025 1. Rajesh Yadav, aged about 36 years, S/o- Late Shivcharan Yadav, R/o- Village -Senha, P.O- Ladhup Senha, P.S-Chandwa District- Latehar. 2. Rahul Kumar, aged about 36 years, S/o Vishwanath Prasad, R/O Village-Mahuadanr, P.O+P.S - Mahuadanr, District- Latehar. 3. Deepak Kumar Mishra, aged about 31 years, S/O Dilip Kumar Mishra R/o Village -Ambatikar, P.O+P.S- Latehar, District Latehar. …… Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary Government of Jharkhand, having office at Project Building, P.O. & P.S. - Dhurwa, District – Ranchi 2. Jharkhand State Bar Council through its Chairman, having office at Bungalow No. 8. Near Kendriya Vidyalay, North Office Para, P.O & P.S. Doranda, Ranchi-834002, Jharkhand. 3. Jharkhand State Legal Service Authority, through its Member Secretary having its office at 88R9+92F, Vidyanagar, Forest Officers' Colony, P.O & P.S. Doranda, Ranchi, Jharkhand 834002 4. District Bar Association, Latehar through its president, having its office at, Bar Association Building, Civil Court Latehar, P.O & P.S. Latehar, District- Latehar Jharkhand 829206. …... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR --------- For the Petitioners : Mr. V. P. Pathak, Advocate For the Resp.-State : Ms. Ruchi Mukhi, A.C to A.A.G-IA For the Resp. No.4B : Mr. Prashant Kr. Rahul, Advocate --------- 04/Dated: 02 nd September, 2025 1. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the grievance of the petitioners has already been redressed and he has instruction not to pursue the present writ petition and as such, he seeks permission to withdraw the same. 2. Learned counsel for the other sides have no objection. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. - 1 - W.P.(C) No.975 of 2025 2025:JHHC:26587 4. Pending interlocutory application, if any, stands disposed of. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Ravi-Chandan/- - 2 - W.P.(C) No.975 of 2025