Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30820 (CHH)

VIKASH THAKUR @ PAPPU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1321/2022 · 2025-03-21

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:13580 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1321 of 2022 1 - Vikash Thakur @ Pappu S/o Shri Davinav Singh Aged About 38 Years R/o Gharghoda, Tahsil-Gharghoda, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Md. Saleem Khan @ Kolthu S/o Md. Shareef Aged About 38 Years R/o Gharghoda, Tahsil-Gharghoda, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Dinesh @ Baba Shriwas S/o Dilharan Shriwas Aged About 40 Years R/o Gharghoda, Tahsil-Gharghoda, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Superintendent of Police, Raigarh, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Station House Officer Police Station- Gharghoda, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioners : Mr. Ashutosh Mishra, Advocate For Respondents /State : Mr. Shakib Ahmed, Panel Lawyer ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 21.03.2025 1 Heard Mr. Ashutosh Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr. Shakib Ahmed, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State/respondents. ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Date: 2025.03.22 14:57:47 +0530 2 2 The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with the following prayer :- “(i) set-aside / quash the impugned FIR dated 12.05.2022 registered in Crime No. 148/2022 at PS Gharghoda District Raigarh, in the interest of justice. (ii) grant any other order(s), deemed fit & just in the facts & circumstance of the case in favour of petitioner.” 3 It has been pointed out by learned State counsel that in the present petition though the petitioners had challenged the impugned FIR, but at this stage, charge-sheet has already been submitted and charges have already been framed against them. 4 In view of the same, we do not find any good ground for interference. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra