Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3082 (AP)

D SWARNA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/1302/2025 · 2025-07-28

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010011932025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1302/2025 Between: 1. D SWARNA, W/O D. SRIMANNARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O D.NO.19-13/1-12, NARAYANAPURAM, TIRUCHANOOR ROAD, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT 2. D. SRIMANNARAYANA REDDY,, S/O D. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O D.NO.19-13/1-12, NARAYANAPURAM, TIRUCHANOOR ROAD, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI EAST POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI URBAN 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, EAST POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI TIRUPATI DISTRICT 5. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, EAST POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ, or order or direction more particularly in the nature of the writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in interfering in civil disputes by way of illegal settlements at the instance high handed people as improper, unjust and illegal and violation of Principles of Natural Justice consequently direct the Respondents No.2 to 5 not to interfere in civil disputes by way of illegal settlements and others and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be to direct the Respondents No.2 to 5 not to interfere in civil disputes by way of illegal settlements and pass such IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to permit the petitioner herein to implead as the proposed Respondent No. 6 in the above Writ Petition No. 1302 of 2025, on the file of this Hon'ble High Court, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V ESWARAIAH CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…..to issue a writ, or order or direction more particularly in the nature of the writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in interfering in civil disputes by way of illegal settlements at the instance high handed people as improper, unjust and illegal and violation of Principles of Natural Justice consequently direct the Respondents No.2 to 5 not to interfere in civil disputes by way of illegal settlements and others and pass such……” 2. Sri V.Eswaraiah Chowdary, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that as per the instructions from the party, they wanted to withdraw this Writ Petition. To that effect, a memo dated 28.07.2025, has been filed in the Registry. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 29.07.2025 MH 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 25 WRIT PETITION NO: 1302/2025 Dt.29.07.2025 MH