249 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Ram Chander and another The State of Haryana and others CORAM:- Present: DEEPAK SIBAL of respondent No. 5 and filed his Power of Attorney which is ordered to be placed on record. petitioner No.2 has expired. unrepresented. Even t No.2 have appeared. 02.04.2025 sd Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Ram Chander and another Versus The State of Haryana and others - HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL None for the petitioner(s). Mr.Saurabh Mago, D.A.G., Haryana. DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Mr.Sandeep Malik, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No. 5 and filed his Power of Attorney which is ordered to be placed on record. As per office report, petitioner No.1 has been served and petitioner No.2 has expired. On the last date of hearing, the petitioner unrepresented. Even today, neither petitioner No.1 nor LRs of petitioner No.2 have appeared. Dismissed in default. 02.04.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.9166-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 02.04.2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL SUMEET GOEL Mr.Saurabh Mago, D.A.G., Haryana. Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No. 5 and filed his Power of Attorney which is ordered to be petitioner No.1 has been served and On the last date of hearing, the petitioners remained either petitioner No.1 nor LRs of petitioner (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2000 (O&M) 02.04.2025 s ...Respondents Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No. 5 and filed his Power of Attorney which is ordered to be petitioner No.1 has been served and s remained either petitioner No.1 nor LRs of petitioner SUDHIR KUMAR 2025.04.07 10:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document