BHEEM SINGH S/O SHRI SURAJBHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/1275/2025 · 2025-09-25
Avneesh Jhingan, Baljinder Singh Sandhu
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30817 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30817 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:39582-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) No.1275/2025 Bheem Singh S/o Shri Surajbhan, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village Nangal Bavla, Police Station Tatarpur, District Khairthal Tijara (Raj.) (At Present In Open Air Camp Alwar) through His Son Namely Pritam Singh S/o Shri Bheem Singh, Aged About 21 Year, R/o Village Nangal Bavla, Police Station Tatarpur, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.) 301404 ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Rajasthan through the Secretary Home, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. The District Parole Advisory Committee through its Chairman, District Magistrate, Khairthal-Tijara.
3. Superintendent Central Jail, Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishram Prajapati For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat,Dy.GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU
Order 25/09/2025
1. This petition is filed aggrieved of rejection of the prayer for second regular parole.
2. The grievance raised is that the petitioner has suffered incarceration of more than eight years and nine months including remission and after complying with the condition of the first regular parole surrendered within time, yet the prayer for second regular parole has been rejected.
3. Learned Dy. Government Advocate fairly submits that circular dated 17.07.2025 has been issued with regard to
[2025:RJ-JP:39582-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1275/2025]
consideration of the application for subsequent parole where the inmate had complied with the conditions of the earlier parole.
4. In view of the above statement, the impugned order is set aside. The matter is remitted back to respondent No.2 to decide the application for second regular parole afresh in accordance with law taking into consideration the circular dated 17.07.2025.
5. It shall be appreciated if the application is considered and decided expeditiously not later than three weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
6. This criminal writ petition (parole) is allowed.
(BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Simple Kumawat /65