- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23193 WP No. 21107 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO.21107 OF 2024 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. DR. C.V. RAMESH S/O LATE C.S. VENKATARAM, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.8/4, KRISHNA ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU-560004. 2. SRI ROHITH C. RAMESH S/O DR. C.V. RAMESH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.8/4, KRISHNA ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU-560004. 3. SMT. RACHANA B. RAMAN W/O SRI B.N.V. RAMAN, D/O DR. C.V. RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.128, 1ST MAIN ROAD, 2ND STAGE, MAHALAKSHMI PURAM, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, BENGALURU-560086. 4. SRI C.V. GOVERDHAN S/O LATE C.S. VENKATARAM, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.8/3 ‘NIRMAN’, KRISHNA ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU-560004. 5. SRI C.G. ABHISHEK S/O SRI C.V. GOVARDHAN, Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23193 WP No. 21107 of 2024 AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.8/3 – ‘NIRMAN’, KRISHNA ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU-560004. 6. SMT. POOJA C.G. D/O SRI C.V. GOVARDHAN, W/O SRI VISHNU VIJAYKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.8/3 – ‘NIRMAN’, KRISHNA ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU-560004. 7. SMT. RADHIKA ASHOK KUMAR W/O LATE C.V. ASHOK KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, RESIDING AT FLAT NO.1601, PENISULA HEIGHTS, 17TH MAIN ROAD, MARENAHALLI, J.P. NAGAR 2ND PHASE, BENGALURU-560078. 8. SMT. DIVYA VIJAY MADUPALLI D/O LATE C.V. ASHOK KUMAR, W/O SRI VIJAY MADUPALLI, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RESIDING AT FLAT NO.1601, PENISULA HEIGHTS, 17TH MAIN ROAD, MARENAHALLI, J.P. NAGAR 2ND PHASE, BENGALURU-560078. 9. SRI DHIREN C. ASHOK D/O LATE C.V. ASHOK KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, RESIDING AT FLAT NO.1601, PENISULA HEIGHTS, 17TH MAIN ROAD, MARENAHALLI, J.P. NAGAR 2ND PHASE, BENGALURU-560078. 10. SRI C.V. SHEKAR S/O LATE C.S. VENKATARAM, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.102 – ‘SHEKARS’, 6TH MAIN ROAD, 5TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560041. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23193 WP No. 21107 of 2024 ALL ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR AUTHORISED PERSON: SRI DHIREN C. ASHOK. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI PRAMODA GOWDA T.P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE BRUHATH BENGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N.R. SQUARE, BENGALURU-560002 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 2. STATE OF KARNATAKA THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, 4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. THE ASSISTNAT DRIECTOR, TOWN PLANNING, SOUTH ZONE BRUHATH BENGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, 9TH CROSS, 9TH MAIN ROAD, 2ND BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560011. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI BOPANNA B., AGA FOR R-1 & R-2; SRI K.B. MONESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-3 & R-4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE DEMAND NOTICES DATED 03.07.2024 BEARING NOS.BBMP/EODB/CH/14358/24-25 AND BBMP/EODB/CH/14359/24- 25, BOTH ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 DEMANDING PAYMENT TOWARDS GROUND RENT (INCLUDING GST) AND LABOUR CESS AMOUNT AND OTHER ADDITIONAL CHARGES AND LEVIES AT ANNEXURE-A AND B. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23193 WP No. 21107 of 2024 ORAL ORDER The captioned petition is filed seeking following reliefs: “a) Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ of like nature, or direction, quashing the Demand Notices dated 03-07-2024 bearing Nos.BBMP/EoDB/CH/14358/24-25 and BBMP/EoDB/CH/14359/24-25, both issued by the Respondent No.3 demanding payment towards Ground Rent (including GST) and Labour cess amount and other additional charges and levies at ANNEXURE-A & B. b) Grant such other and further relief/s as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case in the interests of justice and equity.” 2. It is brought to the notice of this Court that across the Bar, the issue is dealt by the Co-ordinate Bench in the reported judgment in W.P.No.23086/2022 and connected matters. The Co-ordinate Bench, while deciding the issue, has set-aside the Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2021 (Karnataka Act No.01 of 2022) and the Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23193 WP No. 21107 of 2024 (Amendment) Act, 2023, (Karnataka Act No.37 of 2024). Therefore, this Court deems it fit to cull out the operative portion of the order, which reads as under; "ORDER (i) The writ petitions are partly allowed. (ii) The Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2021 (Karnataka Act No.01 of 2022), is hereby quashed and set aside. (iii) The Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2023, (Karnataka Act No.37 of 2024), is hereby quashed and set aside. (iv) It is hereby declared that the provisions contained in Section 18-A of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961, read with Rules 37-A and 37-C of the Karnataka Planning Authority Rules, 1965, are applicable only in respect of ‘Development Plan’ containing the proposal for construction on plots measuring more than 20,000 square meters in extent and not in respect of plots measuring less than 20,000 square meters. (v) It is hereby declared that if fee has been earlier collected for change of land use or while approving a layout plan, fee shall not be collected for subsequent ‘Development Plan’ in terms of the ‘Note’ found below TABLE I of Rule 37-A of the Karnataka Planning Authority Rules, 1965. - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23193 WP No. 21107 of 2024 (vi) It is hereby declared that the linking of the fee leviable under Rule 37-A of the Karnataka Planning Authority Rules, 1965, to the ‘market value’ or ‘guidance value’ as determined under Section 45-B of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, is illegal. However, liberty is reserved to the respondent-State Government and the BBMP to re-fix a standard after collecting empherical data. (vii) Consequently, all the impugned Circulars which seek to give effect to the Rules 37-A and 37-C of the Karnataka Planning Authority Rules, 1965, are hereby quashed and set aside. (viii) It is hereby declared that Clause 3.8 of the Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike Building Bye- laws, 2003, providing for ‘Ground Rent’, is illegal and are accordingly quashed and set aside. (ix) Consequently, all the impugned Demand Notices raised by the respondent-BBMP, in respect of the writ petitioners herein are also quashed and set aside. It would be advisable that the BBMP may come out with a scheme for ‘One Time Settlement’ and settle the levy and collect the fee generally acceptable to the citizens of Bengaluru. This would also augment the present situation." 3. In the present writ petition, the core issue raised stands substantially covered and decided by the - 7 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23193 WP No. 21107 of 2024 authoritative pronouncement of the coordinate bench, wherein the writ petitions were partly allowed and several consequential reliefs were granted. The Hon’ble Court, in unequivocal terms, quashed and set aside the Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Acts of 2021 and 2023 (Karnataka Act Nos.01 of 2022 and 37 of 2024 respectively). 4. The Court further declared that the provisions under Section 18-A of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961, read with Rules 37-A and 37-C of the Karnataka Planning Authority Rules, 1965, are applicable only to development proposals concerning plots exceeding 20,000 square meters, and not to smaller plots. Importantly, it was also held that if a fee has been previously collected for change of land use or approval of layout plan, no further fee shall be levied for subsequent development plans, in view of the explanatory 'Note' to Table I of Rule 37-A. - 8 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23193 WP No. 21107 of 2024 5. The Court declared illegal the linkage of such levies to market or guidance value under Section 45-B of the Karnataka Stamp Act, and consequently, quashed all Circulars and demand notices issued to give effect to such unlawful interpretations. Clause 3.8 of the BBMP Building Bye-laws, 2003, imposing 'Ground Rent', was also struck down. 6. In view of these comprehensive declarations and findings, it is submitted that the controversy raised in the present writ petition no longer survives for adjudication independently, as it is squarely covered by the binding judgment of the coordinate bench. In the light of the law laid down in the reported judgment substantially covering the issue, which is raised in the captioned writ petition, the writ petition is liable to be allowed strictly aligning to the operative portion of the said writ petition. 7. In view of the above, this Court proceeds to pass the following; - 9 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23193 WP No. 21107 of 2024 ORDER (i) The writ petition is allowed. (ii) The impugned demand notice dated 03.07.2024 issued by respondent No.3 as per Annexures-A & B is hereby set-aside. (iii) Respondent- BBMP hereby directed to issue fresh/modified plan as the case may be. (iv) Respondent- BBMP is hereby directed to forthwith process the petitioner's application seeking building license and sanction of the building plan, strictly in accordance with law. (v) It is made clear that the issuance of the building license and approval plan shall not be withheld merely on the ground that the BBMP is contemplating to file an appeal against the reported judgment. (vi) If the building license and sanction plan are issued, the same shall be subjected to the outcome of any appeal that may - 10 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23193 WP No. 21107 of 2024 be filed by the BBMP against the judgment. Pending applications, if any, are also disposed off. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE MBM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 34