MR. ANUSH COLIN SEQUEIRA v. DR MOHAMMED SIRAJ MOTESHAM
MFA/3889/2018 · 2025-07-04
P Sree Sudha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30813 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30813 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24219 MFA No. 3889 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA MFA NO. 3889 OF 2018 (MV-I) BETWEEN:
MR. ANUSH COLIN SEQUEIRA, S/O EDWARD G SEQUEIRA, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, R/AT 1-29/2403/2, HOIGE BAIL ROAD, BOLOOR, MANGALURU TALUK, D K DISTRICT PIN-575 007. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. RAVISHANKAR SHASTRY G., ADVOCATE) AND:
DR. MOHAMMED SIRAJ MOTESHAM, S/O LATE MOHAMMED ISMAIL MOTESHAM, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT FLAT NO.801, PRESIDENCY APARTMENT, ATTAVARAKATTE, MANGALURU, MANGALURU TALUK, D K DISTRICT-575 003. …RESPONDENT
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 23/02/2018 PASSED IN MVC NO.697/2017, ON THE FILE OF THE MEMBER, MACT & I ADDL.
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MANGALURU, D.K., PARTLY ALLOWING
Digitally signed by MADHURI S Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24219 MFA No. 3889 of 2018
THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant is present.
2. Though it was ordered to take steps by way of substituted service, the appellant has not complied the same.
3. Hence, the appeal is dismissed.
Sd/- (P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE
CS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1