[106] [1] Manjit Kaur Amrik Singh [2] Manjit Kaur Amrik Singh [3] Joginder Singh Amrik Singh Coram : Present: PANKAJ [1] that the appeals were preferred through Mr. A.S. Sullar, unfortunately expired. [2] forward. [3] [4] disposed off 28.04.2025 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-3223 Date of Decision : Manjit Kaur versus Amrik Singh FAO-3224 Manjit Kaur versus Amrik Singh FAO-3225 Joginder Singh versus Amrik Singh HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Mr. T.S. Sullar, Advocate for the appellant **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant(s) submits that the appeals were preferred through Mr. A.S. Sullar, unfortunately expired. Despite repeated communications, appellant(s) have not come Dismissed for non-prosecution. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands disposed off. 28.04.2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 3223-1996 Date of Decision : 28.04.2025 …Appellant ….Respondent 3224-1996 …Appellant ….Respondent 3225-1996 …Appellant ….Respondent PANKAJ JAIN Advocate for the appellant(s). Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant(s) submits that the appeals were preferred through Mr. A.S. Sullar, Advocate, who has Despite repeated communications, appellant(s) have not come prosecution. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant(s) submits who has Despite repeated communications, appellant(s) have not come All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.04.28 21:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document